The cstatistics predictive value of the timi risk score for mortality was 0. Does simplicity compromise accuracy in acs risk prediction. A metaanalysis of 40 derivation studies on 216,552 patients and of 42 validation studies on 31,625 patients. Comparison of the grace, heart and timi score to predict. The timi score identified no low risk patients at this safety level. A meta analysis of 40 derivation studies on 216,552 patients and of 42 validation studies. You can read more about the scoring system, the variables used and the result interpretation below the form. Like the timi score, it was not designed to assess which patients anginal symptoms are due to acs.
The timi risk score may be a useful tool for risk strati. Grace global registry of acute coronary events for both the discharge diagnosis and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events mace is calculated. A critical form of cardiovascular disease is acute coronary syndrome acs, which includes heart attack and unstable angina that may lead into heart attack. The grace and timi scores correlate moderately with the extent of coronary disease assessed by the syntax score. Accuracy of the timi and grace scores in predicting. Read comparison of the heart, timi and grace risk scores for chest pain patients at the emergency room, journal of the american college of cardiology on deepdyve, the largest online rental service for scholarly research with thousands of academic publications available at. There were 10562% patients who had two vessel coronary artery disease.
Pdf comparing heart, timi, and grace scores for prediction of. In this prospective observational uk cohort of ed patients with suspected cardiac chest pain, the heart score outperformed timi and grace in its ability to predict 30day major adverse cardiac event mace when incorporating a. Predicting 30day major adverse cardiovascular events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention riskpci score was developed to predict 30day mace, such as. Although the timi score is the one most frequently used in acute coronary syndromes acs without stsegment elevation, the grace score has potential prognostic superiority, as it was created. Timi, pursuit, and grace risk scores oxford academic journals. The grace score is a prospectively studied scoring system to risk stratifiy patients with diagnosed acs to estimate their inhospital and 6month to 3year mortality.
Performance of the scores was compared by calculating auc curves. Modelling by the university of edinburgh team suggests that implementation of the grace risk score produces a saving of 3080 lives for every 10,000 patients. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction timi risk score for stemi was created as the simple arithmetic sum of independent predictors of mortality weighted according to the adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression analysis in the intravenous npa for treatment of infarcting myocardium early ii. The grace risk score stratifies mortality risk 6 mo 3 y from myocardial infarction st elevation and nonst elevation in patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome. By using validated risk scores, we can help decrease the risk of missing ami and the resultant adverse events. Esc guidelines for the management of acute coronary.
Comparison of riskpci, grace, 1 timi risk scores for. Timi and grace are the risk scores that up until now have been most extensively investigated, with grace performing better. Use of the timi score to risk stratify acute coronary syndrome patients. Are we missing acute mis with clinical risk scores. The timi risk score for unstable anginanonst elevation mi. Diagnostic accuracy of timi versus grace score for. To assess the hypothesis that the grace and timi risk scores satisfactorily.
A timi risk score of 0 or 1 does not equal zero risk of adverse outcome. The timi risk score for unstable anginanonst elevation. The heart score outperformed the grace and timi scores in. Grace, pursuit, and timi scores in risk stratification of chest pain pts prospective data collection for timi score. Timi and grace risk scores predict both shortterm and long. Global registry of acute coronary events grace predicts outcomes at 6 months. A retrospective analysis of the timi and grace risk scores. Grace comes from the global registry of acute coronary events, an international acs database and is calculated at hospital admission and at. Conclusion the heart score out performs grace and timi in predicting mace in patients presenting to the ed with cardiac sounding chest pain. Prognostic value of timi score versus grace score in st. Interestingly, the shortterm, inhospital risk score such as timi score is also useful in risk stratification for a longterm outcome. Grace score calculation was made using an online calculator s. The grace and timi score were calculated based on prospectively collected data.
These criteria were developed during early timi trials to define minor and major hemorrhagic episodes in patients of st segment elevation mi stemi treated with a fibrinolytic drug and have. The results and analyse of spearman rank showed that timi has p 0,000 r 0. Like timi, is simple to use but has a poor predictive power i. Risk stratifying chest pain patients in the emergency. All these scores were developed for shortterm prognosis. Timi risk score for stelevation myocardial infarction. Accuracy of the timi and grace scores in predicting coronary. The grace scores, pursuit scores and timi score were subsequently divided into low, intermediate and high equivalent strata to facilitate comparison. Approach to stemi and nstemi lal c daga1, upendra kaul2, aijaz mansoor 3 1fellow dnb cardiology. Methods pub med was systematically searched for the timi, pursuit and grace risk score studies, especially the uanstemi studies.
The timi risk score is a tool that doctors use to predict the chances of having or dying from a heart event. The heart, timi, and grace scores have been applied in the emergency department ed to risk stratify patients with undifferentiated. This study showed that compared with timi score, grace score provides greater diagnostic information with regards to the extent of cad in patients with nsteacs. Pdf grace risk score vs timi risk score researchgate. In this study, the timi score is more reliable in predicting mortality in patient with stemi, compare with grace score. The more recent global registry of acute coronary events grace score was developed from the registry, 8 with a population of patients across the entire spectrum of acs. The grace risk score has made an invaluable contribution to the evaluation of treatment outcomes and patient care.
Additionally, the number of lowrisk patients identified by each score were compared at a fixed level of safety of at least 95% or 98% sensitivity. Application of the timi risk score for unstable angina and nonst elevation. The percent of patients with 30day mace with heart scores between 0 and 3, 46, and 710 was 2%, 28%, and 63%, respectively. A comparison of the timi, grace and heart scores heart. For nonstsegment elevation myocardial infarction nstemi, the timi score is based on seven clinical indicators with scores ranging from 0 to 7. Timi, grace and alternative risk scores in acute coronary syndromes. Type 2 mi t2mi is common and is associated with significant mortality, yet the. This distinguishes the timi risk score from other scoring systems that are more complex computationally since they require weighting terms for the predictor variables and cannot be implemented easily without computer assistance. Approach to stemi and nstemi journal of association of. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction timi predicts risk of adverse outcomes in the next 14 days. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Timi, grace and alternative risk scores in acute coronary. In patients with uanstemi, the timi risk score is a simple prognostication scheme that categorizes a patients risk of death and ischemic events and provides a basis for therapeutic decision making.
The heart score is sometimes compared to the timi thrombolysis in myocardial infarction and grace global registry of acute coronary events risk scores, which are older acs scores. Between timi and grace scores, identify the one of better prognostic performance in patients with stemi. The timi risk score for stemi figure 2 showed a strong association with mortality at 30 days, with a 40fold graded increase in mortality between those with a risk score of 0 and those with a score 8 p trend score 5 identified 12% of patients with a mortality risk 2fold higher than the mean for the population. The accuracy of the grace and timi scores in predicting coronary disease extension in patients with nonstelevation acute coronary syndromes acs has not been established. Esc guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. The primary hypothesis of the study is that the heart score is a significantly better predictor than the timi andor grace. Comparing performance of grace, heart and timi scores in predicting acs conclusion. The heart score outperformed the grace and timi scores in discriminating between those with and without mace in chest pain patients, and. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction timi risk score, global registry of acute coronary events grace risk index and platelet glycoprotein iibiiia in unstable angina 3. Derived4 from the timi 11b study,5 the score is additive without weighting 07. Pdf timi, grace and alternative risk scores in acute coronary. Very complex to use and a large portion of the score is dependent on the patient age. Heart outperforms timi, safely identifying more lowrisk patients.
Timi risk score11 has been validated and can be used. In high acuity chest pain patients, the heart score is superior to the timi and grace scores in predicting 30day mace. Timi score risk classification showed that among 5029. The global registry of acute coronary events grace and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction timi risk scores are validated to predict risk of adverse outcomes among patients with type 1 myocardial infarction mi. Comparison of the grace, heart and timi score to predict major. Esc guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent stsegment elevation. Pdf accuracy of the grace and timi scores in predicting. A comparison of the timi, grace and heart scores full. Grace score bleeding risk crusade score take home messages continued 1. Although this was a retrospective study, for each patient the original grace and timi scores at admission were recalculated based on their medical records. The timi score for stsegment elevation myocardial infarction stemi was created and validated specifically for this clinical scenario, while the grace score is generic to any type of acute coronary syndrome.
Application of the timi risk score for unstable angina and. The standard of care for clinical decisionmaking was a. The grace and timi scores have been well validated for assessment of prognosis in nonstelevation acute coronary syndrome. A prospective cohort evaluation in emergency patients peter reaney, hamish elliott jamie cooper. Application of the grace, timi, and tarraco risk scores in. Assessing heart attack risk and guiding treatment the research cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death globally.
1427 1130 747 149 1063 556 902 272 385 257 553 781 58 699 874 199 1534 713 745 1139 38 815 1479 62 1129 483 1249 1447 483 1490 805 1432 741 910 46 927 1313 673