This is a thorough, technical and theoretical exploration of what lijphart terms consociational democracy as a form of democracy suited to plural societies. Friendly or cooperative association, as between groups or organizations. The limitations of the consociational arrangements in iraq. As highlighted in chapter 1, there are two distinct approaches to constructing con.
Political accommodation is achieved by cooperation among the elites of segmental parties that each represents a single segment of society. His four main examples of western consociational democracy are the netherlands, belgium, switzerland and austria, though he notes considerable consociational elements in canada and israel. Consociational parties and political accommodation in. Arend lijphart is best known for his theory of consociational or power sharing democracy, which enables the peaceful governance of deeply divided societies. Consociational democracy can be found in countries that are deeply divided into distinct religious, ethnic, racial, or regional segmentsconditions usually considered unfavourable for stable democracy.
Here, once again, arend lijphart is directing our attention to matters which will surely engage much of the attention of students of comparative politics in the. He tests the performance of these institutions through a statistical analysis of their relative efficiency in three broad fields. Consociational definition of consociational by the free. Examining thirtysix democracies during the period from 1945 to 2010, lijphart arrives at importantand unexpectedconclusions about what type of democracy works best. Pdf arend lijpharts 1969 article on consociational democracy was a compelling critique of prevailing theories of democratic stability and the. May 26, 2008 arend lijphart is best known for his theory of consociational or power sharing democracy, which enables the peaceful governance of deeply divided societies. Concentration versus sharing of executive power 90 7 executivelegislative relations. The favourable factors for the establishment and maintenance of consociational democracy are among the most contested elements of consociationalism.
A here, once again, arend lijphart is directing our attention to matters which will surely. While it may be difficult to achieve and maintain stable democratic governments in countries with deep religious, ideological, linguistic, cultural, or ethnic cleavages, lijphart argues that it is not at all impossible. Lijphart starts by differentiating between majoritarian and consensus democracy by asking the question who governs and in whose interest in cases of disagreement. Angloamerican political systems exemplified by britain and the united states, continental european political systems france, germany, and italy, and a third category consisting of. In this updated and expanded edition of his classic text, arend lijphart offers a broader and deeper analysis of worldwide democratic institutions than ever before. Arend lijpharts concepts have defined the international debate in political. Arend lijphart s 1969 article on consociational democracy was a compelling critique of prevailing theories of democratic stability and the launching pad for one of the most widely regarded research programs in contemporary comparative politics. In almonds analysis, for example, these societies were seen as oscillating between the angloamerican type and the continental european. Consociational democracy as a tool for conflict resolution. Here, once again, arend lijphart is directing our attention to matters which will surely engage much of the attention of students of comparative politics in the next. Review and critique of the literature on consociational. Review and critique of the literature on consociational democracy. Arend lijpharts 1969 article on consociational democracy was a compelling critique of prevailing theories of democratic stability and the launching pad for one of the most widely regarded research programs in contemporary comparative politics. If it available for your country it will shown as book reader and user fully subscribe will benefit by.
Since the publication of the politics of accommodation 1968 and democracy in plural societies 1977 professor lijpharts theories and practical implementations have played a key role in establishing enduring peace settlements. Types, cases, causes and consequences by arend lijphart introduction this article is an elaboration on the. It is an indispensable work for all students of democracy and comparative politics, in part because it provides a frank and fascinating portrait of how the concepts. Consociationalism, a stable democratic system in deeply divided societies that is based on power sharing between elites from different social groups. Thinking about democracy is the definitive collection of four decades of work on the powersharing model of democracy by its most important analyst and advocate, arend lijphart.
Consociationalism is a form of democracy which seeks to regulate the sharing of power in a state that comprises diverse societies distinct ethnic, religious, political, national or linguistic groups, by allocating these groups collective rights. Welcome to episode 2 of season 3 of real democracy now. This book examines the theoretical and practical relevance and challenges of the consociationalist model of democracy. Table 1 the characteristics of majoritarian democracy, consensus democracy, and consociational democracy adapted from lijphart 1984a, 1989a. Pdf lijphart, lakatos, and consociationalism researchgate. Arend dangremond lijphart born 17 august 1936, apeldoorn, netherlands is a political scientist specializing in comparative politics, elections and voting systems, democratic institutions, and ethnicity and politics. Consociational democracy in lebanon 1945 1975 college american university of central asia grade a author irina wolf author year 2002 pages 9 catalog number v064 isbn ebook 9783640408047 isbn book 9783640408320 file size 432 kb language english tags.
He received his phd in political science at yale university in 1963, after studying at principia college from 1955 to 1958. Consociational democracy as a tool for conflict resolution in. Competing research programs in an earlylakatosian mode. Consociational democracy, arend lijphart, grand coalition, mutual veto, pro. Therefore it need a free signup process to obtain the book. It is this normative aspect of consociationalism that gives great significance to the hitherto unresolved debate between lijphart and daalder just how far. India, consociational theory, and ethnic violence asian. The consolidation of the consociational democracy in lebanon. Season 3 is looking at elections, electoral systems, electoral reform and alternatives.
Lijpharts definition of consociationalconsensus democracies from cultural aspects to institutional characteristics. Consociational democracy world politics cambridge core. Consociational democracy in multiethnic societies grin publishing. While his power sharing model has been widely criticized, it is also being adopted in countries as diverse as the netherlands, india, austria, south africa, and malaysia. Evaluation of lijpharts model of consensus democracy the. Lijphart then goes on to define proportionality as being a general principle of consociational democracy that applies not only to the electoral system but also to the composition of the public service and to the allocation of public funds 2000. Consociational democracy, however, may also be viewed prescriptively, as a normative model, a criterion for evaluating political systems and a guide to future policy and action. Accordingly, lijphart adopted the term consociational democracy. Pdf consociational democracy in theory and practice. Pdf abstract consociational democracy as the goal and a tool in mitigating consociational democracy, arend lijphart, grand coalition, mutual veto, pro. The basic purpose of the work is to explore the nature of consociational systems of government in stable western democracies and to investigate whether these provide a good blueprint that. Ecology a subdivision of an association having one dominant species of. Arend lijpharts patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of. The term was further elaborated into a general classificatory concept by arend lijphart.
Recent advances in consociational theory luther and deschouwer, 1999 have elaborated on the crucial role of segmental parties in consociational democracy. The article pays tribute to professor arend lijphart, pioneer in the studies of democracy. The debate over the former is provoked by the inductive character. Lijphart democratic political systems types cases causes. Arend lijphart is known for his works on comparative methods,1 electoral systems,2 and nonmajoritarian or powersharing democracy. Consociationalism, a stable democratic system in deeply divided societies that is based on power sharing between elites from different social groups the theory of elite cooperation. The theory was extended as new consociational democracies were discovered. Abstract consociational democracy as the goal and a tool in mitigating conflict in the third world has been frequently used during the last decades, especially in subsaharan africa. Yale university press, c dlc ocolc download citation on researchgate democracy in plural societies. Consociational democracy can be found in countries that are deeply divided into distinct religious, ethnic, racial, or regional segmentsconditions. The debate concerns both the favourable factors themselves and their status.
Lijphart, lakatos, and consociationalism world politics. The characteristics of lebanese consociational democracy. The consolidation of the consociational democracy in. For me, it is the ideal system because it is the most capable of maximizing the level of representation given to the widest possible amount of the electorate. Power sharing and selfgovernance in consociational theory in the middle of the 19th century, the liberal philosopher john stuart mill in his considerations on representative government expressed skepticism with. Evaluation of lijpharts model of consensus democracy. Almonds famous typology of political systems, first expounded in 1956.
View consociational democracy research papers on academia. These both seem like reasonable explanations, but i really felt this deserved more attention. It is this normative aspect of consociationalism that gives great significance to the hitherto unresolved debate between lijphart and daalder. Lijphart is the leading authority on consociationalism, or the ways in which segmented societies manage to sustain democracy through powersharing. Typologies of democratic systems, comparative poltical studies 1 1. The favourable factors for consociational democracy. The aim is to understand whether there is a democratic solution to the conflict through power sharing democracy. Consociational democracy and the case of switzerland. Lijphart famously distinguished four basic components of consociational democracy. View notes lijphart from poli 212 at mcgill university.
Presents a study which investigated the claims of arend lijphart that switzerland is a case of consociational democracy. In the 1950s, when the study of politics shifted from a traditional concern with formal institutions to. Lijphart developed this concept in his first major work, the politics of accommodation, a study of the dutch political system, and further developed his arguments in democracy in plural societies. Theoretical, conceptual and methodological problems in. Political scientists define a consociational state as one which has major internal divisions along ethnic, religious, or linguistic lines, with none of the divisions large enough to form a majority group, but which remains stable due to. Patterns of dominance and balance of power 116 8 electoral systems. This study will examine a particular form of democracyconsociational democracywhich modifies the. Furthermore, the western model of democracy was unable to account for the record of stability in the smaller european countries which enjoyed considerable equilibrium despite their segmentation. Yale university press, 1977 political science 248 pages.
Consociationalist theory served initially as an explanation of political stability in a few deeply divided. Through the analysis of political systems in six continents, he demonstrates that what he calls consociational democracy can be successful in severely divided or plural societies. Almonds famous typology of political systems, first expounded in 1956, he distinguishes three types of western democratic systems. A comparative exploration arend lijphart while it may be difficult to achieve and maintain stable democratic governments in countries with deep religious, ideological, linguistic, cultural, or ethnic cleavages, lijphart argues that it is not at all impossible. Thus this chapter clarifies the research strategy chosen for this investigation. In this discussion paper a number of theoretical, conceptual and methodological problems in applying lijpharts patterns of. Introduction my ideal of democracy aligns closely to lijpharts model of consensus democracy, which i will be discussing at length in this essay. Consociational democracy in lebanon 19451975 publish. Consociational democracy can be found in countries that are deeply divided into in particular by arend lijphart, and is used today as both an analytical and a. Consociational democracy in multiethnic societies publish. Power sharing and selfgovernance in consociational theory in the middle of the 19th century, the liberal philosopher john stuart mill in his considerations on representative government expressed skepticism with regard to the possibility of democracy zin.
416 1255 1297 626 260 747 949 1403 318 190 954 1297 956 1197 740 340 885 928 342 519 1281 604 621 1207 521 1463 582 1167 1490 96 733 1420 873 680 386 1434 276 1081 73 737 541 76 525 1446